By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Search
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: A Canopy in Novi Sad was 23 Tons heavier than allowed
Share
Font ResizerAa
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Font ResizerAa
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
  • W&N
Search
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Follow US
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All rights reserved.
Sarajevo Times > Blog > WORLD NEWS > A Canopy in Novi Sad was 23 Tons heavier than allowed
WORLD NEWS

A Canopy in Novi Sad was 23 Tons heavier than allowed

Published January 1, 2025
Share
SHARE

The construction of the canopy of the railway station in Novi Sad, which collapsed on November 1 and killed 15 people, was 23.11 tons heavier than originally designed, according to the expert’s report

Namely, the Faculty of Technical Sciences in Novi Sad – Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, by order of the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Novi Sad, conducted an expert examination of the building of the Railway Station in Novi Sad, in order to determine the cause of the collapse of the canopy.

In the opinion of the expert, it is stated, among other things, that “at the moment immediately before the break, the structure of the canopy was burdened with a load that is greater than originally designed by about 107 kg/m2, that is, by about 23.11 tons”.

The expert team of experts stated in the report that “they believe that visual indications of such a break must have been noticeable in the days preceding the demolition of the canopy”.

“Tensions, as a key structural element of ensuring the load-bearing capacity and stability of the canopy, were in a state of reduced load-bearing capacity and increased load at the time of demolition,” the Faculty states in the conclusions of the calculation analysis.

“The reduced load capacity was confirmed by the results of the laboratory tests of the IMS Institute, according to which, at the moment immediately before the collapse, about 40 percent of the wires in the tensioners were out of order. The cause of this condition is corrosion that occurred at the joint of the tensioner and the roof support. This defect could have been determined through an inspection of the structure during control inspections prescribed as part of the regular maintenance of the facility,” the conclusion states.

The increase in the load compared to the original project occurred, the report says, on several occasions.

“During the construction of the building in 1964, instead of a fall layer, a layer of unreinforced concrete was constructed from the upper side of the canopy. The embedded layer of non-reinforced concrete has a mass of about 65 kg/m2 greater than the mass of the designed fall layer. This defect did not have a decisive impact on the load-bearing capacity and stability of the structure, but it had a negative impact on reducing the reserve load-bearing capacity of the constructed structure,” claim the experts.

During the reconstruction of the building, which began in 2021, the project envisaged the removal of “all layers down to the concrete” and performing a new layer of pad and waterproofing.

“The on-site inspection determined that the layer of unreinforced concrete had not been removed, but the existing tiles on the underside of the canopy had not been removed either. In this way, the canopy load was increased by an additional 20 kg/m2.

Also, by reconstructing The installation of glass with metal frames is planned, which adds another 27 kg/m2 to the canopy. Taking all of the above into account, the canopy structure, at the moment immediately before the collapse, was loaded with a load that was higher than the originally designed one by about 107 kg/m2, or “for about 23.11 tons,” the expert report states, N1 writes.

Photo: Aleksandar Milutinović/Turistička organizacija Novog Sada

Inclusion and not hatred needed to overcome the Common Crisis

Plan of bilateral Military Cooperation between BiH and France signed

OSCE: We must unite across Countries and Organizations to counter Terrorism

Google Pays €326 Million to Settle Tax Dispute in Italy

Turks fiercely responded to Threats from Israel: Netanyahu will have the same Fate as Hitler

Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Threads Bluesky Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Bulgaria and Romania officially joined the Schengen Area
Next Article What does the minimum Wage Increase specifically mean for FBiH Workers?
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stay Connected

10.2kFollowersLike
10.1kFollowersFollow
414FollowersFollow

Latest News

The Health Condition of the Leader of the Chechen Republic seriously deteriorated
January 12, 2026
Trump: American Companies get Access to Venezuela’s Oil Reserves and other Resources
January 12, 2026
Minus 16 Degrees Celsius Today in Sarajevo
January 12, 2026
Published Photo of Halid Beslic from the JNA: How the Army affected his Career
January 12, 2026
Bosnia and Herzegovina Near the Top of Corruption Rankings
January 12, 2026
BiH’s Foreign Trade Deficit exceeded 14 Billion BAM
January 11, 2026
Bosnian Satirical Portal Satro.info Shuts Down After Nine Years of Operation
January 11, 2026
Iran Accused Demonstrators Of “Burning Hospitals, Mosques, And Shooting At Security Forces”
January 11, 2026
Dodik Insults The Highest BiH Institution
January 11, 2026
Greenland Responds to Trump: ‘We Don’t Want to Be Americans’
January 11, 2026
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Follow US
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
Go to mobile version
adbanner
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?