There are too many key questions on the exam before the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Undoubtedly, the attacks on its institutions and vital structures of statehood have never stopped.
The once political and reform momentum, admittedly more announced than realized, disappeared in a sea of politicking, blockades and fierce confrontations between ideologies on opposite sides.
The guest of Dnevnik 3 was Bakir Izetbegović, president of the SDA.
Speaking about the past period after the general elections, Izetbegović asserted that the parties of the Coalition of the Three made a series of concessions to the detriment of the state and the pro-Bosnian bloc, deceiving, as he said, both himself and us that SNSD president Milorad Dodik had changed and that the SDA did not know with them. It is obvious, he says, that things are worse.
“Nothing good was done, nothing of what they promised to do, and a lot of bad things were done. A series of unnecessary concessions were made to get into power and to preserve some peace and stability, as the foreigners convinced them, at the expense of the pro-Bosnian patriotic bloc, in favor of the parties led by Milorad Dodik and Dragan Čović. They gave them fourth delegates, positions to which they appointed people from black lists. They left the security sector to Dodik, they leave the energy sector to Dodik and Čović, they leave the construction of roads to the HDZ”, stated Izetbegović.
He also claims that the Troika parties are preparing to make “irreparable” concessions, so he stated that these are state property, the Election Law and the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
“The Constitutional Court is the last barrier that will stop attacks on the state one day when there are no more foreigners and OHR here, and it must not be left behind,” emphasized Izetbegović.
In Dnevnik, the president of the SDA spoke, among other things, about where this party is today and what its plan is, and whether there are common interests of the SDA and the Troika for the sake of the state or whether party disagreements are too heavy a burden.
