By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Search
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Ambassador Field: I Fought The Rule of Law, and The Rule of Law Won
Share
Font ResizerAa
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Font ResizerAa
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
  • W&N
Search
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Follow US
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All rights reserved.
Sarajevo Times > Blog > POLITICS > Ambassador Field: I Fought The Rule of Law, and The Rule of Law Won
POLITICS

Ambassador Field: I Fought The Rule of Law, and The Rule of Law Won

Published: July 7, 2019
Share
SHARE

The rule of law. It’s a phrase I hear almost every day. I probably use it as often. It is the basis of complaints from citizens, accusations between politicians, and criticisms from civil society. It is at the heart of the European Commission’s recent ‘Opinion’ on BiH. I am not sure we know what we mean we use it, and I am sure we do not always agree. But I am sure that it matters. As English philosopher John Locke put it more than three hundred years ago, ‘Wherever law ends, tyranny begins’.

There are many more qualified minds than mine, legal experts, who can elaborate the traditions and histories of the concept. For me, much of this can be reduced to a relatively simple concept: no one is above the law. The same rules should apply, regardless of position, influence or wealth.

And I think this concept goes a long way to identify what people are most often frustrated or angry about when they say the rule of law is missing, or falling short. When someone is able to avoid responsibility, because of who they know, or who they are, this offends our most fundamental sense of justice. If someone can commit a crime, abuse their position, or fail to do their job, and there are no consequences for them, what is our incentive for playing by the rules ourselves?

When I talk to citizens of this country about what they would like to see change, or why in increasing numbers they are thinking about leaving, I keep hearing terms like fairness and dignity. This is not abstract. Fairness means not having to join a political party to get a chance to work in the public administration, when you are the best candidate. It means not having to pay a bribe or risk your small business being swamped in ‘inspections’ or trumped up court cases. It means public contracts are decided on value for money, not connections. Dignity means receiving medical treatment to which you or your family are entitled, without having to provide ‘gifts’, or exchange favours. It means knowing that the education qualifications you studied so hard for cannot simply be bought or faked.

All of these are questions of the rule of law. It is much more than the court system – though that is a crucial and very visible part. It is about the consistent application of known rules in everyday life. And it is about the spirit and principles behind those rules, not only the lowest possible standard you can get away with. This is especially important for public officials, who should set the example for all, and be open to these checks. Independence does not mean being above scrutiny.

So what can we do? There are many excellent individuals and organisations working to shine a light on these issues, all deserving of our support. Corruption hates transparency, and the more people can share and draw attention to these practices the better. Citizens can and should expect better from those they elect, and those they fund through their taxes.

In addition to this bottom-up pressure, there needs to be support from others. In its increased funding for BiH, the UK has put rule of law issues right at the centre, including professionalization of judges and prosecutors, clear conflict of interest rules, transparent public financing, protection of whistle blowers and journalists, more efficient courts, better police coordination, reduced administration burdens for business and individuals, de-politicisation of publicly-owned companies, and effective measures against discrimination.

I also strongly welcome the EU Opinion’s clear focus on rule of law issues, as necessary for moving ahead on the EU path and improving lives in BiH today. Examples include

  • Track records of proactive investigations, indictments, prosecutions and convictions in corruption cases
  • Transparency in privatisation processes
  • Effective cooperation among law enforcement bodies
  • Independent judiciary and High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council
  • Equality and non-discrimination of citizens, and the protection of vulnerable groups
  • Professional and de-politicised civil service
  • Freedom of expression and of the media and the protection of journalists

Public confidence in the rule of law begins as soon as elections are announced, and I was pleased to see the Opinion highlight continued failures to improve the electoral system in BiH, including the lack of elections in Mostar for the last 11 years. This is not normal. And far from the standards expected from any democratic country.

Which brings me back to the idea that no-one is above the law. More than anything else, this is the test of whether any country is moving in the right direction. The UK and other friends stand ready to help achieve it. Its citizens want it. And it matters to all of us.

*With thanks to The Clash

Prosecutor’s Office extended the Detention to Sarajevo Old Town Mayor
Record Quantity of Twenty Two Kilograms of Narcotic Drug Speed found in Sarajevo
Bill to amend the Criminal Code of BiH was submitted in the House of Representatives
What is the Number of Missing Persons in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The Israeli Embassy moved the Reception from Sarajevo
TAGGED:#BiH#citizens#ruleoflaw#UKEU
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Threads Bluesky Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article EU gives BiH 1.5 Million Euros for Union Civil Protection Mechanism
Next Article Meeting of Ministers of South-East European Cooperation Process Tomorrow in Sarajevo
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stay Connected

10.2KFollowersLike
10.1KFollowersFollow
414FollowersFollow

Latest News

Spain Reaffirms Support for BiH’s EU Path, Highlights Growing Bilateral Cooperation
October 13, 2026
V4 Film Festival Starts Tomorrow at Meeting Point Cinema
October 13, 2026
Fifteen-year-old Girl from Tuzla released from Custody
October 13, 2026
Izetbegovic and Komsic speak about the Formation of the Government and a Potential Coalition
October 13, 2026
The Federation of BiH plans a new Debt of 40 Million BAM
October 13, 2026
Barbarez publishes an Autobiography called “Kreisläufe”
October 13, 2026
Bajtal to Raport: How to Explain 400,000 Invalid Ballots and Why Is This Not an Issue
October 13, 2026
Non-working Sundays in the Federation of BiH once again in Question
October 13, 2026
The IMF warns that BiH’s economic Growth is slowing down, Inflation is rising
October 13, 2026
BiH FM Reveals What He Asked of the Saudi Prince over the Issue of Dodik’s Lobbyists
October 13, 2026
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Follow US
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?