By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Search
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Less EUFOR means more NATO in BiH
Share
Font ResizerAa
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Font ResizerAa
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
  • W&N
Search
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Follow US
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All rights reserved.
Sarajevo Times > Blog > POLITICS > Less EUFOR means more NATO in BiH
POLITICS

Less EUFOR means more NATO in BiH

Published: May 3, 2022
Share
SHARE

If Russia blocks the extension of the European Union (EU) peacekeeping mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), alternative options are further NATO engagement and strengthening of domestic security institutions, but the option of reaching an agreement should be left open.

The EUFOR mission in BiH is renewed every year, by a decision of the United Nations (UN) Security Council. It was the same on November 3rd, 2021, when Russia also supported it, RSE writes.

What kind of mission is this?

The EUFOR Althea mission is the EU’s longest military operation, the only field mission, and the only mission with an executive mandate to use force.

Namely, the official mandate of all foreign military missions in BiH is to ensure the implementation of the Dayton Peace Agreement, which ended the war in BiH, and to “contribute to a secure environment”.

It is conducted in the field using NATO resources and capabilities, based on an agreement with NATO known as “Berlin Plus”.

What are the possible options?

According to the 2003 agreement, the EU and NATO can deploy additional troops to BiH at any time, in the short term, in the event of a threat to the country’s security.

Alija Kozljak points out that no decision of any other international organization is needed for additional engagement of NATO in BiH.

He emphasizes that, however, the option for negotiations should be left open until November, because ”Russia is aware of these alternative options that Blinken is talking about and knows that some of these alternative options are worse for Russia than the current option of engaging EUFOR.”

What is the official position of Russia?

Neither official Moscow nor Russian diplomats in BiH have explicitly spoken in recent months about whether they will oppose the extension of the EUFOR mission in BiH.

Russian Ambassador to BiH Igor Kalabuhov said in an interview with Radio Television of Republika Srpska (RTRS), the public service of this BiH entity, on March 24th, speaking about the extension of the mandate: “It would be good for EUFOR to do its job in accordance with the Dayton Peace Agreement without any political interference.”

E.Dz.

Komsic: No one has the right to forget what happened to Sarajevo and BiH
The Dayton Peace Agreement was officially confirmed 25 Years ago in Paris
Neskovic: “The Government of Republika Srpska is deceiving Citizens“
Becirovic after the Meeting with Schmidt: The Answer to the anti-Dayton Policy must be concrete and strong
Republic of Srpska celebrated the anniversary the first Constitution
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Threads Bluesky Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article The Government has absolutely no Understanding of Workers’ Interests
Next Article Arnaut: One Severance Pay for BiH Politician amounts 80 minimum Pensions
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stay Connected

10.2KFollowersLike
10.1KFollowersFollow
414FollowersFollow

Latest News

Blanusa is SDS Candidate for President of Republika Srpska
June 7, 2026
Gradiska Faces Loss of Border Crossings if BiH Signs Croatia Agreement Now, ITA Warns
June 7, 2026
EU’s New ‘Non-Paper’ Signals Fresh Approach to Western Balkans
June 7, 2026
Round 99: Disagreements Between Washington and Brussels Over the OHR Are Breaking Across BiH’s Back
June 7, 2026
Two Silver Medals for BiH at the Balkan Judo Championship
June 7, 2026
Dodik: If the OHR is not resolved we will have to wage a Liberation Struggle
June 7, 2026
Associations of Victims: Cancel the Registrations of Parties with Names associated with War Crimes
June 7, 2026
Positive Tourism Trend continues in Sarajevo Canton
June 7, 2026
Can the Crisis Between the US and the EU Jeopardize the Functioning of the OHR?
June 7, 2026
Barbarez: The Match had great Significance for the Preparations
June 7, 2026
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Follow US
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
Go to mobile version
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?