By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Search
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Radovan Karadzic’s Wife’s Appeal against US Sanctions was rejected again
Share
Font ResizerAa
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Font ResizerAa
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
  • W&N
Search
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Follow US
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All rights reserved.
Sarajevo Times > Blog > POLITICS > Radovan Karadzic’s Wife’s Appeal against US Sanctions was rejected again
POLITICSWORLD NEWS

Radovan Karadzic’s Wife’s Appeal against US Sanctions was rejected again

Published August 8, 2025
Share
SHARE

The District Court in Columbia has again denied the motion of the wife of former Republika Srpska President Radovan Karadzic, who is serving a life sentence for genocide and war crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina, after she complained that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) wrongfully refused to remove her from the list of Specially Designated and Blocked Persons (SDN).

Considering the appeal of Ljiljana Karadzic, wife of Radovan Karadzic, which concerns allegations that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury wrongfully denied her request to be removed from the list of Specially Designated and Blocked Persons (SDN), the District Court in Columbia has issued a decision to deny.

In her latest motion, she argued that OFAC’s decision was arbitrary, BIRN reports.

The Court’s decision stated that OFAC relied on Ljiljana Karadzic’s attendance at public events celebrating [her husband’s] crimes and legacy, including an event that challenged the legitimacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

“OFAC also relied on evidence, including statements by the prosecutor publicly defending Radovan or distorting the facts about the Bosnian war, her public criticism of the ICTY, including her public characterization of the ICTY as an ‘illegal’ and ‘malignant cancer’, and her refusal to cooperate with the ICTY’s efforts to capture Radovan, the Court’s decision states.

The Court also states that OFAC pointed to personal contacts and correspondence, including one in which she urged her husband never to surrender to the authorities.

Karadzic argues in his motion that OFAC’s sanctions against her are not justified because these events occurred “more than 20 years ago.”

“OFAC did not rely ‘solely on the prosecutor’s 20-year history of helping her husband evade arrest. It appropriately considered other past conduct, as well as more recent actions, in reaching its conclusion. Among the more recent actions is the prosecutor’s submission of false or misleading information regarding her contacts with Radovan while he was in hiding,” the decision states.

Her lawyer Peter Robinson tells Detektor that Karadzic has done nothing in the past 20 years to justify maintaining US sanctions, adding that the European Union lifted the same sanctions 14 years ago.

“I am very disappointed that the courts of the United States of America are unwilling to intervene and correct the abuses associated with US sanctions,” says Robinson.

The court states in its decision that anyone on the sanctions list can file a request for administrative review of OFAC’s decision, and that Karadzic, along with her children, was placed on the SDN list while her husband was on the run because they were suspected of helping him evade arrest.

Karadzic and her children filed a request with OFAC in 2020 to be removed from the SDN list. They filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Columbia in May 2023, claiming that OFAC had unreasonably delayed its decision on their removal request.

OFAC ultimately denied her request in October 2023, finding that she was “actively obstructing or posing a significant risk of actively obstructing” the Dayton Agreement or the Peace Implementation Conference conclusions.

Nevertheless, after her children dropped the lawsuit, Karadzic filed an amended complaint a month later, again challenging OFAC’s delay in deciding her request and its decision to deny her request.

Nearly a year later, the District Court of Columbia granted OFAC’s motion to dismiss the complaint and dismissed Karadzic’s motion as invalid, finding that the delay count of the complaint had become invalid at the time OFAC issued its decision.

Karadzic also filed a motion for mediation, which the Court denied in its decision.

Speaking of this request, which he says is unusual in the delisting process, attorney Robinson explains that he hoped that if he could convince President Donald Trump’s administration to begin negotiations, they could take a different approach to sanctions in the Balkans than the administration of former President Joe Biden.

In March 2019, the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MIKT) sentenced Radovan Karadžić to life imprisonment for the genocide of Bosniaks from Srebrenica, the persecution of Bosniaks and Croats throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina, the terrorization of the population of Sarajevo during the siege of the city, and the holding of UN peacekeepers hostage.

Analysis: To which Country this Situation in the Middle East suits the best?

Biden calls Putin a ‘crazy SOB’

German Bundestag Member Adis Ahmetović Calls for Increased Troop Deployment in EUFOR Mission

Foreign Media: Jannik Sinner and Laila Hasanovic Living Together in His Monte Carlo Apartment

How did Bosnian manage a Million-Dollar Drug Business in Croatia from Prison?

Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Threads Bluesky Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Dodik submitted a Request to the Constitutional Court of BiH
Next Article The Meeting between Putin and Trump on August 11
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stay Connected

10.2kFollowersLike
10.1kFollowersFollow
414FollowersFollow

Latest News

Nebojsa Vukanovic announces His Candidacy for the Member of BiH Presidency
May 1, 2026
EPBiH Reclaims Property Registered Under EP HZHB Ownership”
May 1, 2026
Interview with the Ambassador of BiH to the United Nations Zlatko Lagumdzija
April 30, 2026
HR Schmidt: BiH should take Advantage of changing Circumstances in Europe to advance its European Path
April 30, 2026
Sniper Alley Searches for a Photographer Who Captured a Boy During the Siege of Sarajevo
April 30, 2026
BiH Minister of Defense meets the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Spain to BiH
April 30, 2026
The Central Bank of BiH pays 184 Million BAM in Profit in BiH Budget
April 30, 2026
“The Court’s Decision to release Kunarac is a Slap in the Face to all Victims of War Crimes”
April 30, 2026
Discover the Forgotten Gates of Sarajevo: Secrets and the Influence of Austro-Hungarian Architecture
April 30, 2026
American Production Company to Chronicle BiH’s Historic Road to the World Cup
April 30, 2026
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Follow US
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
Go to mobile version
adbanner
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?