By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Search
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Who would have been closer to forming the Government if Schmidt had not imposed Changes to the Electoral Law?
Share
Font ResizerAa
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Font ResizerAa
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
  • W&N
Search
  • HOME
  • POLITICS
    • BH & EU
  • BUSINESS
  • BH TOURISM
  • INTERVIEWS
    • BH & EU
    • BUSINESS
    • ARTS
  • SPORT
  • ARTS
    • CULTURE
    • ENTERTAINMENT
  • W&N
Follow US
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All rights reserved.
Sarajevo Times > Blog > POLITICS > Who would have been closer to forming the Government if Schmidt had not imposed Changes to the Electoral Law?
POLITICSWORLD NEWS

Who would have been closer to forming the Government if Schmidt had not imposed Changes to the Electoral Law?

Published November 24, 2022
Share
SHARE

While the unprincipled, and behind-the-scenes fight for the majority in the Bosniak Caucus in the House of Peoples of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) continues, the question arises as to how it would have looked and whether it would have come to the fore to this extent if the High Representative had not imposed a decision to change the Constitution of the FBiH and the Election Law on election night.

If Christian Schmidt had not changed the rules of the game a few minutes after the end of the election, the SDA would not have been able to prevent them from being thrown out of power at the federal level, because a third of the delegates (6 out of 17) per caucus would have been sufficient to nominate delegates for the vice president of the FBiH.

According to the old rules, in order to block the process, you needed at least 12 (out of 17) delegates in one of the ethnic caucuses, a number that could only be achieved by the HDZ or in cooperation with coalition partners from the Croatian National Assembly (HNS).

Both Sarajevo political blocs would have a minimum of 6 delegates in the Bosniak caucus and could propose a candidate for the FBiH vice president. The truth is that the SDA would have more, but in the end, it would not change anything in terms of the possibility of bypassing this party when forming the government. Likewise, the Coalition of Eight would have enough delegates in the Serbian caucus to propose a vice president from among the Serbian people.

The decision would be in the hands of Dragan Covic on which of the blocs he would bring into power because, in the event that they sided with one or the other bloc in the House of Representatives of the Parliament of the FBiH, they would have the upper hand. Such a possibility also exists in the new constitutional and legal framework. In the event that no party or coalition in the Bosniak caucus gets 13 delegates, it would practically mean that the opposing bloc cannot propose a candidate for the vice president of FBiH at all.

In this regard, NiP president Elmedin Konakovic recently spoke out, commenting on the current filling of the House of Peoples and the decision of the High Representative.

”The lottery will decide whether we will have more than 12 or 13. We have enough of these stable ones to be able to propose the vice-president and president of FBiH in the Bosniak Caucus, along with the unfortunately late decision of Christian Schmidt, which favors only SDA. If the old proposal model had remained, things would have already been completed, coalitions would have been signed and no one would have tried to block the processes in the Bosniak caucus,” Konakovic stated.

Konakovic correctly analyzed the situation in the Bosniak caucus, but he ignored the principles that the HDZ has adhered to for many years, that they form the government, if they are already able to decide, only with those parties that have majority support within their people, as measured by the Houses of the People. No amount of pressure from the international community would change that because HDZ never gambled with the principle of ”ethnic legitimacy”.

If the position of the HDZ in both variants of the law, and in the context of the current results, is unavoidable, the question arises, what is the essential difference between Schmidt’s changes? Covic explained it vividly.

”Those who fantasized about controlling the Croat caucus, that story is over forever. The struggle of Sarajevo politics today is how to control the Serb caucus and Bosniak caucus. There is no more interest in the Croat caucus,” Covic explained.

In other words, Schmidt made the Croatian caucus of the House of Peoples of FBiH almost untouchable for civil parties. However, at the same time, he made the situation difficult for them in the Bosniak caucus.

Given that the focus of all political actors was shifted to the cantonal assemblies that elect delegates to the FBiH House of Peoples, it became obvious that Schmidt, with his decision, transferred the political struggle to the people’s caucuses to the greatest extent, diminishing the importance of the House of Representatives of the FBiH Parliament, at least in the process of forming the Government of the FBiH.

He further complicated the process of bypassing national parties in the process of forming the government. In practice, we see that the Trojka, which consists mostly of civil parties, must form broad, inconsistent, and ideologically heterogeneous coalitions in order to prevent the SDA from controlling the Bosniak caucus with the hope that no one will change sides at the last moment.

Even if he manages to satisfy the interests of a minimum of eight parties, if we ignore the very functionality of such a Government, it would be more than challenging. Besides, the situation in this sense will not be any simpler in any future election cycle. All this is only the result of Schmidt’s decision, and that is why the insufficiently strong resistance to the imposed solutions, especially from the SDP and Our Party, is unclear, Klix.ba reports.

E.Dz.

BH Tennis Player Aldin Setkic progressed 34 Positions

The US welcomes the UN Security Council’s unanimous Reauthorization of EUFOR

Dodik: Any Imposition of Changes to the Election Law would mean the End of BiH’s European path

Russian Embassy in BiH: US Sanctions are an Example of Double Standards and Hypocrisy

One Man and Phone Calls saved dozens of Lives

TAGGED:#BiH#bosnia#OHR#politics
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Threads Bluesky Email Print
Share
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article In less than a Day, the Funds for the Treatment of Medina Heco were collected!
Next Article All accused in the Case of Dzenan Memic acquitted of Concealment of Evidence
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Stay Connected

10.2kFollowersLike
10.1kFollowersFollow
414FollowersFollow

Latest News

Kos: Montenegro is the first to enter the EU, followed by Albania
May 2, 2026
Suspect Arrested in Connection with Woman’s Murder in Sarajevo
May 1, 2026
Thousands protest in Zenica, the Fight for the Steelworks is a Matter of the Industry’s Survival
May 1, 2026
One Person killed in BiH’s Capital
May 1, 2026
RS Government Report: Schmidt labeled as Usurper, call for Respect for Dayton
May 1, 2026
Street Named After Dr. Dušanka Vujasić Solemnly Opened in Goražde
May 1, 2026
IRMCT Confirms Defense of War Criminal Ratko Mladic Files Urgent Motion for Release
May 1, 2026
Zenica Meeting Sends Clear Message: Urgent Implementation of FBiH Government Plan for New Steel Plant
May 1, 2026
A two-million-BAM Scandal is Looming in Banja Luka over Monument Construction
May 1, 2026
Today is May Day, the Holiday of Labor and the Struggle for Workers’ Rights
May 1, 2026
Sarajevo TimesSarajevo Times
Follow US
© 2012 Sarajevo Times. All Rights Reserved.
  • ABOUT US
  • IMPRESSUM
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT
Go to mobile version
adbanner
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?